The Blog Of Nunzia Catalfo

New stadium in Recife may be one of the most modern in the country

To receive the 2014 World Cup in style, the building will include Recife Stadium Arena Recife, located in São Lourenço da Mata, a town in the metropolitan area's overall development.

With a capacity of 46,000 seats, an estimated investment of $ 450 million (through a public-private partnership (PPP), leading private investment with focus on profitability and the use of the stadium ), the forecast is for the delivery end of 2012.

The stage is distinguished by its cover, now in its design, all the elements required by FIFA, as the visibility, comfort, safety and comfort.

"The project is designed to make that stage of the landmarks of the country, following the most stringent international standards for this type of activity," explains architect Daniel Fernandes, head of the project, with experience in planning stages. gather employment history stages in the projects as the new arena Ponte Preta in Campinas, Brazil, Gremio of Porto Alegre, and was hired as technical adviser to the new reform bill Maracanã (RJ). Arena Recife, the visibility will be the big difference.
"In Recife, the visibility will be given priority so that all fans have a perfect view of the blind field without fixed points. addition, we have boxes and VIP areas to give fans the greatest comfort possible, "explains the architect.
Social and environmental measures such as use of solar energy solutions, ventilation, water reuse, wastewater treatment and natural light also important for the project. In the vicinity of the stadium will be built in City Cup, in which new development should essere costruiti 9.000 alloggi.   Da segnalare anche un altro fattore positivo: il Recife Arena sarà costruito in un'area di grande fascino naturale, senza un ambiente urbanizzato.
  Il concept del progetto ha preso in considerazione l'integrazione con il territorio naturale e anche il suo rapporto con l'occupazione del futuro della città di Coppa del Mondo.  

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

A.p. Diffusion Lab Lab Report

OPEN MASTER POMPOSA

Monday, July 26, 2010

Injection For Lipoma For Sale

Back. Malaysia fury.

After the glories of Malaysia back on track for a few days before the holidays.

What to say? Malaysia is an amazing place: British administration - rational, present, minimally invasive - hot-mixed Asian population and communicative. Service, kindness, and good food.

Malaysia is the intersection of three cultures, Indian, Chinese and Arabic, screwed on a historically English administration. People work, the lifestyle is intense, but warm.

and eat incredibly well.
A people happy? I do not know. Perhaps a people near the new center of the world: Asia.

You breathe air that is not on the Asian continent si respira in Europa da 20 anni, quella del cambiamento e della crescita economica continua. Un'aria sicuramente influenzata dal grande gigante dormiente, la Cina, che sta lentamente macinando crescita economica costante, trascinando con sè tutta l'economia della regione, Australia inclusa. Forse vale la pena trasferirsi.

Comunque torno con il sacco pieno di contatti, nuove idee e un piccolo premio per la miglior presentation dei tre workshop.

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Deputy Travis Junior Costumes

syntax and semantics. Meaning? The birth of the meaning

WILARD parte 8: sintassi e semantica.
Vedremo come sintassi e semantica sono tra loro intrecciate anche in matematica. E cercheremo di capire cosa vuol dire valore intrinseco ed estrinseco dei simboli.

What is meant by the meaning of a symbol in terms of algebraic ? (See The birth of the meaning). Does anyone remember the
boring math classes in high school including "notorious" considerable product-algebra, in particular the one that follows.

(a + b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + 2ab + b ^ 2 (1.)

In algebra long chains of symbols can be transformed so mechanical . The right side of Eq .1 may be replaced by the left side, and vice versa. If we had a denominator of an expression - eg. -A similar term, we could simplify

a^2 + 2ab + b^2
--------------------- =
( a + b )^2

(a + b)^2
---------------- = 1 (2.)
(a+b)^2

Ricorderete i minuziosi passaggi, necessari per ridurre una espressione lunga e complessa, ad una più semplice formata da pochi segni. Questo è quel che si intende con forma sintattica della matematica. O algebra.
In algebra un simbolo non ha un significato in sè e per sè , viene trasformato seguendo regole e prassi estrinseche, i.e. pratiche che prescindono il contenuto del simbolo . Cosa rappresentino "a" e "b" o "a^2" "b^2", se siano alberi, pears, even numbers, Istat, person, or mini-colored pony, not a question.
The expression (1.) Is not a numerical equality, but a logical equivalence: the chain of symbols on the left is a perfectly and logically equivalent to the right. What do you mean the component parts and why they are equivalent, it is not so important from the standpoint of algebraic.

The expression (1.) in fact was known to surveyors ( mathematical ) at least 2000 or perhaps 3000 years, with methods and practices that are not appealed the magical power of algebraic rules, but the geometry. The geometry, unlike algebra, based its meaning on the intuition that we have real space: for instance the concept of continuity, which goes beyond a formal definition, and that permeates the analysis.

What is the expression (1.) Geometry in ? Sometimes it is a complex numerical problem back to geometry, but in this case just draw a segment s which is the sum of two segments in and b , and "make the square". That is, build a square shape with base and height s = a + b . The area is numerically speaking s ^ 2 , and thus (a + b) ^ 2. Algebraically speaking, s ^ 2 = (a + b) ^ 2

But what is s ^ 2 from the geometric point of view, in this case? S and draw the square by joining the points that divide s in both segments to and b, from side to side, we note that is formed by four symmetrical geometric figures: two squares and two rectangles . If we calculate the area of \u200b\u200bthese four figures, as is evident their bases and heights (are rectangles and squares, their area is given by multiplying the base by the height) we see easily that have value a ^ 2, b ^ 2 , ab, ab .

Since these four areas cover the whole area of \u200b\u200bthe square, by construction, is easy to see that the area of \u200b\u200b s ^ 2 is equal to the sum of its parts a ^ 2, b ^ 2, ab, ab, namely:

s ^ 2 = (a + b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 + ab + ab (3.1)

ie

(a + b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + 2ab + b ^ 2 (3.2)

Just as indicated in the expression ( 1.). Ultimately, the syntax is not a game purely mechanical and abstract syntax hides a semantics. The semantics above, and in turn explains the syntax. QED.

But if the two expressions, and the two worlds are completely equivalent, so why waste time learning the meticulous and tedious algebra when the geometry is so easy and intuitive to understand. Probabilmente se lo sono chiesti in molti questo, per primi gli algebristi italiani del '500, e la risposta è molto semplice.
Se è facile riportare (a+b)^2 ad un modello geometrico bidimensionale , e in modo relativamente facile è possibile riportare l'espressione (a+b)^3 ad un modello tridimensionale intuitivo, non è possibile creare un modello intuitivo n-dimensionale dell'espressione (a+b)^n, ad esempio non è possibile costruire un modello geometrico quadridimensionale intuitivo dell'espressione (a+b)^4, nè soprattutto è possibile costruire un metodo generale valido per un n qualsiasi fissato a piacere.
The algebra with its mechanisms repeatable and extensible disrupts the barriers of intuition to solve problems that otherwise would not be approached.

Believe it or not, information is based on the same principle, is born from the same philosophy: logic and reasoning in the sense understood not as Intute and content, but as mere syntactic manipulation of symbols: computers manipulating symbols, exemplified by binary numbers, the popular expression is that "computer programs are run." These symbols carry a content, which has been mechanized, and then ignores their semantic aspect, but without wasting it: hides the syntax semantics, and in some ways surpasses, the crosses. To view of many, and many calculations, the syntax is stopped, the calculations are close, the program ends, the syntax and semantics is inspired. Or output data or representational form. Image, for example. O word.

Believe it or not, the first computer was conceptually formalized by A. Turing in 1936, defined in a purely abstract and conceptual as pure mathematical tool, and some of the most important problems of information technology including the first of 7 problems of the millennium, have been formulated eight years before the first real computer was built. The
computer from this point of view is purely abstract science. Perhaps the most abstract and most difficult of the sciences. Of course, the most giovane e la più moderna.